Achalasia During Pregnancy: Proposed Management Algorithm Based on a Thorough Literature Review

Fewer than 40 cases of achalasia occurring in pregnant woman have been reported in the literature. Given the rarity of achalasia during pregnancy, and the numerous treatment options that are available for achalasia in general, no guidelines exist for the management of achalasia during pregnancy. Diagnosis of new cases may be difficult as symptoms and physiological changes that occur during pregnancy may obscure the clinical presentation of achalasia. The management of achalasia in pregnancy is also challenging. Treatment decisions should be individualized for each case, considering both the welfare of the mother and the fetus.Since pregnant women suffering from achalasia represent a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge with complex maternal-fetal aspects to consider, we have reviewed the available literature on the subject and summarized current diagnostic and therapeutic options.Additionally, we present a management algorithm as a means to guide treatment of future cases. We recommend that a conservative approach should be adopted with bridging therapies performed until after delivery when definitive treatment of achalasia can be more safely performed.

Factors associated with non adherence to a gluten free diet in adult with celiac disease: A survey assessed by BIAGI score.

INTRODUCTION: The cornerstone of the recommended treatment for Celiac disease (CeD) is a lifelong strict gluten-free diet (GFD). We aimed to identify prospectively the demographic, clinical, social and psychological profile associated with non-adherence to a GFD in adult CeD patients in Israel. METHODS: An anonymous online questionnaire was sent via the Israeli Celiac association and through social networks. Only CeD patients≥18 years old were included. Socio-demographic, laboratory and clinical data as well as anxiety and depression scores were reported. Adherence to a GFD was assessed by a Biagi questionnaire. RESULTS: In total, 301 patients completed the questionnaire with a mean age of 37.5±14.9 years, 79.2% female. The most common presenting symptoms were: anemia (59.7%), abdominal pain (50.8%) and diarrhea (42.8%). According to the Biagi score, 82% of patients were found to be high adherent to a GFD (Biagi 3-4) and 18% were low adherent to a GFD (Biagi-0-2). Univariate analysis revealed that low adherence was associated with: younger age at the time of diagnosis (P<0.001), longer duration of disease (P=0.011) non academic education (P=0.011), below average income (P=0.018), smoking (P<0.001) and no gastroenterology follow up (P=0.038). However, in multivariate analysis, only a young age at diagnosis and smoking were significantly associated with non-adherence to a GFD (OR 0.924, 3.48, P-value<0.001, 0.029, respectively). In further analysis, we identified that age 20 is the best cutoff value to discriminate between those with high adherence and those with low adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Young age, smoking, long disease duration, no academic education, low income and no gastroenterology follow-up were found to be associated with low adherence to GFD rate in a univariate analysis, however only the first two were found to be significant in the multivariate analysis. Additional intervention strategies might improve adherence and reduce future complications with a better quality of life.

A subgroup of first-degree relatives of Crohn's disease patients shows a profile of inflammatory markers in the blood which is more typical of Crohn's disease patients than of normal individuals.

INTRODUCTION: Family member with IBD is the greatest risk factor for developing the disease. The hematological profileof first-degree relatives (FDRs) of Crohn's disease (CD) patients was studied in order to identify healthy FDRs at risk to develop disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty CD patients, 90 FDRs, and 28 non-related individuals (controls) were enrolled. Hematological profile and C-reactive protein were determined. RESULTS: All hematological parameters were significantly different in CD patients compared to controls, with significantly higher levels of CRP, WBC, PMN, MONO, and PLT and lower Hb and lymphocyte count. The hematological profile of FDRs showed values between the controls and CD patients with ten FDRs that their parameters matched those of CD patients and significantly different from other FDRs. This group was defined as high-risk relatives (HRRs). CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the hematological profile and CRP level might be proven as a fast, reliable, and less money-consuming tool to identify FDRs with a probable increased risk to develop the disease.